Dayton Hudson Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question whether the method of accounting for inventory shrinkage used by a retailer, Dajdon Hudson Corporation and Subsidiaries (Dayton Hudson); is permissible. Dayton Hudson appeals from the tax court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s (Commissioner’s) determination of tax deficiencies. We reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
The parties have largely stipulated the facts. Dayton Hudson is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This ease involves the accounting methods used by two of Dayton…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Caldwell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Rotolo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Shea Homes, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Mountain State Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
- Travelers Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Jpmorgan Chase & Co. v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.