Wynn v. State

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Donnie Lee Wynn was convicted of rape,1 child molestation,2 and incest.3 He appeals the denial of his motion for new trial, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence with regard to his rape and incest convictions. Wynn also argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for continuance and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

“On appeal from a criminal conviction, a defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and the evidence is viewed in the light most…