Milbanks v. Coonley
New York Supreme Court
Action commenced in justice’s court by Charles Milbanks against Solomon Coonley. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.
This action was commenced in justice’s court. To the plaintiff’s complaint was attached a bill of particulars marked “X;” to the defendant’s answer, a bill of particulars marked “V.” On the trial it was stipulated by parties and counsel that these two bills of particulars were admitted and received in evidence subject to the right to cross-examine; that the bills should be considered as respectively testified and sworn to by the respective parties. (This is the fair understanding of the case, although in one *168place it speaks as if plaintiff were also to testify to defendant’s bill.) Now,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gould v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Denovsky v. Bach, New York County Courts1916