Legal Opinion

Forte v. THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 8, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

106 N.J. Super. 346 (1969)

255 A.2d 804

FRANK FORTE AND LOUISE B. FORTE, HIS WIFE, NICHOLAS D'IPPOLITO AND KATHERINE D'IPPOLITO, HIS WIFE, LEWIS D'IPPOLITO AND MADELINE D'IPPOLITO, HIS WIFE, JOSEPH LORENZO AND KATHERINE LORENZO, HIS WIFE, EDO BARZELATTO AND MARY-ANN BARZELATTO, HIS WIFE, AND HERWIN CENTERS, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF TENAFLY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 9, 1969.

Decided July 8, 1969.

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Donald W. DeCordova argued the cause for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 179 Duncan Avenue Corp. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. City of HanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Herman Glick Realty Co. v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. E & G ENTERPRISES v. City of Mount VernonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
  4. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API