Fisher v. Bogarth
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Washington County.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Will-son, J.
§ 120. Intervention’, interest which pill authorize. It is a well settled rule in this state, that the interest which will authorize an intervention must be an interest in the subject-matter of the suit. [Ryan v. Goldfrank, 58 Tex. 356; Pool v. Sanford, 52 Tex. 621; Rodrigues v. Trevino, *11254 Tex. 198; Whitman, v. Willis, 51 Tex. 121; Belt v. Raguet, 27 Tex. 182; Burditt v. Glasscock, 25 Tex. Sup. 15; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1350; Meyberg & Wangelin v. Steagall & Co. 51 Tex. 351.] This suit was instituted by Fisher & Weis to recover of Bogarth rent for a storehouse. A distress…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Brandon v. Gulf City Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- Rodrigues v. TrevinoTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Ryan v. Goldfrank, Frank & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Meyberg & Wangelin v. Steagall & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879