Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Bogarth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1884No. 1563Published

Appeal from Washington County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 120. Intervention’, interest which pill authorize. It is a well settled rule in this state, that the interest which will authorize an intervention must be an interest in the subject-matter of the suit. [Ryan v. Goldfrank, 58 Tex. 356; Pool v. Sanford, 52 Tex. 621; Rodrigues v. Trevino, *11254 Tex. 198; Whitman, v. Willis, 51 Tex. 121; Belt v. Raguet, 27 Tex. 182; Burditt v. Glasscock, 25 Tex. Sup. 15; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1350; Meyberg & Wangelin v. Steagall & Co. 51 Tex. 351.] This suit was instituted by Fisher & Weis to recover of Bogarth rent for a storehouse. A distress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Brandon v. Gulf City Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Rodrigues v. TrevinoTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Ryan v. Goldfrank, Frank & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Meyberg & Wangelin v. Steagall & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API