Legal Opinion

Kuchera v. Kuchera

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 4, 2013No. Nos. 4D11-2573, 4D11-2950Published

1Per curiam

The former husband appeals, and the former wife cross-appeals, the trial court’s Third Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We reverse the trial court’s decision declining to characterize the payments to the former wife in the parties’ post-reconciliation marital settlement agreement (“MSA”) for federal tax purposes, and we remand for the trial court to make a ruling on that issue and amend the final judgment. In all other respects, we affirm the Third Amended Final Judgment.

*632The parties’ MSA, under a provision titled “Lump Sum Alimony and Equitable Distribution,” requires the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BoydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Rykiel v. RykielSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Hyotlaine v. HyotlaineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Kidd v. KiddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API