Legal Opinion

Scheidler v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 10, 2003No. 02-3356Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, PJ.

¶ 1. American Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals a declaratory judgment that coverage exists for damage caused by a sump pump to Michael and Kelly Scheidlers' home. Specifically, American Family contends that the trial court erred in construing the policy. We disagree and affirm.

Background

¶ 2. The facts are undisputed and the procedural history uncomplicated. American Family issued the Scheidlers a property insurance policy. The policy covered damage to the Scheidlers' physical dwelling under Coverage A.

¶ 3. The policy's "Perils Insured Against — Section I," which we refer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peace Ex Rel. Lerner v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Vanstone v. Town of DelafieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Ginder v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API