Legal Opinion

Amsterdam v. Hotel Astor, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 13, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPanken, J.

This matter comes before me on a motion to set aside the verdict rendered by the jury in favor of the plaintiff. The facts as disclosed by the testimony show that on a certain date the plaintiff, while descending a staircase to the grill operated by the defendant at its hotel, was injured by slipping on one of the steps, due to a soapy pool having been permitted to remain upon the steps. When submitting this case to the jury, I was not unmindful of the decision in the case of Kipp v. Woolworth & Co. (150 App. Div. 283), decided in the Second Department.

The case of Bussue v. Wagner Leasing Co.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kipp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Curtiss v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summa v. Morgan Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Gondolfi v. Palisade Holding Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. Rigney v. Horn & Hardart Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API