Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Schiefer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1989No. 87-214Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUrbigkit, Justice

As originally assigned to write this opinion, I specially concur in affirming the conviction of the crime of forgery. The place where I specifically differ from the majority as now written is in regard to features of assessed punishment.

I. GUILT ISSUES

Before reaching the fine and penalty questions resulting from the sentence, I would further discuss my perception of the ratification defense by special concurrence. This defense was strongly presented by appellant, Jay Schiefer (Schiefer), to deny crime commission.

By this argument, Schiefer attacks proof of the fraudulent intent required for…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API