Legal Opinion

Sloman v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 35,097PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover the amount unpaid on a contract for. the 'sale to defendant of certain lots bordering on a lake in Oakland county. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that she would insist upon the trial that the contract was void because the sale was an incident to a lottery conducted by plaintiffs; that by way of set-off and recoupment she would claim the allowance to her of the sums paid by her on the contract; that she had been induced to enter into the contract by fraud and misrepresentation, and that she had canceled and rescinded the contract.

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. PolomsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rankin v. BiggerNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API