Legal Opinion
Remo Drug Corp. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided October 4, 1989No. Motion No. M-40219PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edwin Margolis, J.
This motion is brought pursuant to section 10 (6) of the Court of Claims Act. The proposed claim, which is attached to the moving papers and which satisfies the requirements of Court of Claims Act § 11, alleges that on three occasions in *301the spring of 1988 the New York State Department of Social Services paia rams of money to 1055 Pharmacy, Inc. (hereinafter 1055), a Med icaid provider, in violation of a restraining notice to garnishee which had been served on the Department by claimant on June 9, 1987. The motion is being made approximately oí a; year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prusack v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mazzuka v. Bank of North AmericaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- G. E. Weinstein v. GittersNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Glassman v. Letchworth Village Developmental CenterNew York Court of Claims · 1980
- Douglas v. FassoulisNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- Syndicate Building Corp. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1991
- Syndicate Building Corp. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1993