Legal Opinion

Bumsted v. Blair

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 1906Published

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The certiorari allowed in this case we think must be dismissed.

The prosecutor in the writ was a former excise commissioner of Jersey City. He claims that he is still in office, notwithstanding that by section 5 of the act of the legislature, entitled “A supplement to an act entitled 'An act to regulate *379the sale of spirituous, vinous, malt and brewed liquors, and to repeal an act entitled “An act to regulate the sale of intoxicating and brewed liquors,” passed March seventh, one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight, approved March twentieth,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Simon v. Mayor of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  3. Bakman v. Hackensack Improvement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API