Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1953No. 15439PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

From a summary judgment in behalf of a defendant insurance company denying plaintiffs the right of reformation to delete the name of one of them from a liability insurance policy naming both as insured, and further construing the policy to be one which prohibited one of the parties named from invoking the indemnity protection afforded by the policy as applied to damages resulting when the vehicle insured by the policy struck and damaged property of the' other of such persons SO’ named as insured, the plaintiffs appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Appellee urges in his brief that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Binswanger v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Biggins v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Reed v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hermann HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Boatman v. Lites, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998
  3. Wade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Marineau v. General American Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. DarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API