Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Brace

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Eau Claire county: James O’Neill, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order disallowing the plaintiff’s claim against the estate of Henry E. Converse, who made a voluntary assignment for the benefit of his creditors to the defendant, Brace, December 2, 1897. The circumstances under which the alleged claim arose are in effect as follows:

On May 10,1897, Converse, residing at Eau Claire, signed a written order on James W. Tufts, located at Boston, Mas-*342sacbusetts, for a soda-water apparatus (described), for $888 and an old,soda-water apparatus then owned by Converse; and, upon bill of lading, he thereby agreed to honor a sight draft for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Crompton v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  3. W. W. Kimball Co. v. MellonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dodge v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Earle v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. GriswoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Heins v. Thompson & Flieth Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Singer v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API