Legal Opinion

Commerce Drug Co. v. Kirkman Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 29, 1972No. 8719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Bo and1 denying appellant’s petition to cancel appellee’s registration of FLURA-GEL for a “topical fluoride preparation for professional application to teeth.” 2 Appellant is the owner of two registrations for ORA-GEL, one of which has the term in lower-case letters enclosed in a red ova.l and is for a.“chemical compound for relieving *1086the pain of teething babies.”3 The other registration was issued on October 1, 1968, for ORA-JEL for “medicated preparation for relief of teething pains, toothaches, and denture…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. In re Allen Electric & Equipment Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Toro Co. v. Hardigg Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In re Superior Outdoor Display, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API