Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Zo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 12, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

197 N.J. Super. 330 (1984)

484 A.2d 1287

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE COMMITMENT OF Z.O. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE COMMITMENT OF K.W. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE COMMITMENT OF E.S.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 12, 1984.

Decided December 12, 1984.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, FURMAN and COHEN.

Arthur J. Rosenberg, Assistant Deputy Public Advocate, argued the cause for appellants (Joseph H. Rodriquez, Public Advocate, attorney).

David L. Rhoads, Assistant Mercer County Counsel, argued the cause for respondents (Paul T. Koenig,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API