Legal Opinion

Mohney v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1918No. 14237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered June 30, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, Mohney, against the defendants, Davis and Beck, in the superior court for Spokane county, seeking recovery of damages upon eleven causes of action, ten of which were assigned to him. Trial upon the merits in that court sitting with a jury resulted in verdict and judgment awarding the plaintiff recovery upon seven of the assigned causes of action and denying him recovery upon the other four causes of action, one of tlie latter being taken from the jury, the court deciding, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff could not recover thereon. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mohney v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoff v. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Goebel v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hubbell v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API