Downey v. Seib
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of controversy on agreed facts by Margaret F. Downey against George Dan Seib. Judgment directed for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtRich, J.
It appears that John Scótt, the father of the plaintiff, and then owner of real estate in Brooklyn, conveyed the same to the plaintiff for the term of her natural life, the deed running to her as party of the second part, and to his sons John, James, and William as ' parties of the third part, as follows:
“To and for her and their sole use, benefit and behoof for and during and until the full end and term of her natural life. And from and after the death of the said Margaret, the said John and Ann the said parties hereto of the first part, do hereby grant and .convey all the aforesaid Tract,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Shriver v. . ShriverNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Heller v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- McPherson v. . SchadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906