Koopmann v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims WILLIAM KOOPMANN, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 09-cv-333 T v. Filed: September 30, 2020 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. William Koopmann, Lovettsville, Virginia, Plaintiff pro se Jason Bergmann, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section, Washington, D.C., for the Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff pro se, William Koopmann, seeks a tax refund in the amount of $2,416 which he claims he overpaid as a result of the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) application of a special timing rule under Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.