Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Registrant J.G.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 2001Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, J.

I concur in the Court’s disposition of this appeal in all respects except for its conclusion that in proceedings to determine the proper Megan’s Law tier classification of a juvenile adjudicated to be a delinquent based on his guilty plea, the trial court may find, based on clear and convincing evidence, that an element of the sexual offense was not established. Ante at 330, 777 A.2d at 907-08. That conclusion permits a collateral attack on the order of disposition (which would be a judgment of conviction if J.G. were an adult) that is contrary to law and logic. Hence, I dissent from that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API