Legal Opinion
Eldeco, Inc. v. Romines
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 29, 2003No. 2020278PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
This court's no-opinion affirmance dated May 23, 2003, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor.
Ted Romines sued his employer, Eldeco, Inc. ("Eldeco"), seeking workers' compensation benefits for an alleged injury that, he maintained, rendered him permanently and totally disabled. On May 15, 2001, the trial court conducted an ore tenus hearing. Eldeco moved for a judgment as a matter of law, arguing that Romines's claimed injury was not one for which he was entitled to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- City of Tuscaloosa v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Alfa Mutual General Ins. Co. v. OglesbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- BE & K, INC. v. WeaverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte VongsouvanhSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eldeco, Inc. v. RominesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Eldeco, Inc. v. RominesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003