Willingham v. Hooven, Owens, Rentschler & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Trover. Verdict. Practice in Superior Court. Election. Specific Performance. Equity. Damages. Contracts. Vendor and Purchaser. Before Judge Bower. Dougherty Superior Court. April Term, 3884 Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Willingham filed a bill against Hooven, Owens, Rentschler & Company, in which he alleged that, on the 16th day of August, they contracted in writing to furnish him a steam saw-mill outfit, complete, all first-class, the boiler to be constructed to burn all the sawdust necessary to run *235it, all to be of the very best workmanship and material, and to be equal to the capacity of 30,000 feet of inch lumber per day, with proper management. In case of default in workmanship or material, the defendants were to make the same good without extra charge, and should it not .perform as well…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southwestern Railroad v. RowanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
3Cited by13 opinions
- Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Fletcher v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Horne & Ponder v. O. B. & E. J. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Greer v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.