Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1977No. 52700Published

1ConcurrenceRoberts, Judge

Article 1223 of our former Penal Code provided:

“When the homicide takes place to prevent murder, maiming, disfiguring or castration, if the weapon or means used by the party attempting or committing such murder, maiming, disfiguring or castration are such as would have been calculated to produce that result, it is to be presumed that the person so using them designed to inflict the injury.”

As we said in Sistrunk v. State, 486 S.W.2d 304, 305:

“The purpose of Article 1223, supra, is to require that the jury be told by the trial court that if a deceased or injured party was making an attack upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Borroum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Short v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Sistrunk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API