Legal Opinion
Nieves v. City of Yonkers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 10, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 10, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which *413was for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action in the amended complaint on the ground that the receipt of benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c barred the plaintiffs’ recovery under General Municipal Law § 205-e.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Dette v. PartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Damiani v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- O'Hare v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Scannell v. KarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tighe v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Braxton v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kelly v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- The Matter of James R. Diegelman v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- The Matter of James R. Diegelman v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 2016