Legal Opinion
Arkla, Inc. v. Maddox & May Bros. Casing Service, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1996No. 28,081-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
hBROWN, Judge.
Scurlock Oil Company (“Scurlock”) was the first purchaser of oil from Maddox and May Brothers Casing Service, Inc. (“M & M”) which operated wells in the Northeast Lisbon Unit (“the Unit”). The owner of the working interest in these wells was Northeast Lisbon Production Company (“Lisbon”).
In 1987, Arkla, Inc. d/b/a Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company (“Arkla”), who supplied natural gas to operate machinery to produce the wells, perfected a lien under the Oil Well Lien Act affecting property in the Unit owned by M & M and Lisbon. In answer to garnishment interrogatories, Scurlock…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arkla, Inc. v. Maddox and May Bros. Casing Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- McNamara v. Scurlock Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Worldwide Remediation, Inc. v. Onebane, Bernard, Torian, Diaz, McNamara & Abell Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Exxon Corp. v. GoodrichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Packard Management, Inc. v. Real Key Management Transportation Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999