Legal Opinion

Moser v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Carlton county, Holland, J., presiding, (before whom, acting for a judge of the 11th district, the action was tried,) refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The evidence was sufficient to justify the conclusion that the horse, for the killing of which the plaintiffs seek to recover, went upon the defendant’s railroad at a point not far'from its depot at Northern Pacific Junction, by reason of there being no fences *481along the track in that vicinity, nor any cattle-guards at a public highway-crossing; and that the horse went along the track a considerable distance, fell into a railroad bridge, and in some way, not otherwise disclosed by the evidence, was killed. This is within the scope of the complaint, although that goes further, and alleges that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Watier v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Lundquist v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Ericson v. Duluth & Iron Range R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Green v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API