Legal Opinion

Amdar Co. v. Hahalis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered October 18, 1989 reversed, with $10 costs, and petitioner’s motion granted to the extent of severing tenant’s counterclaims.

The commercial loft lease between the parties contains the standard provisions proscribing counterclaims in summary *988proceedings. Such lease provisions are enforceable (Bomze v Jaybee Photo Suppliers, 117 Misc 2d 957 [1983]). Tenant’s counterclaims seek lost business damages allegedly resulting from landlord’s negligent elevator maintenance and breach of contract. The claims are not "inextricably related to [landlord’s] cause of action…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bomze v. Jaybee Photo Suppliers, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. All 4 Sports & Fitness, Inc. v. Hamilton, Kane, Martin Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Ring v. Arts International, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004
  3. Graham Court Owners Corp. v. PowellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  4. Graham Court Owners Corp. v. PowellCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  5. Lucas v. Florent, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API