Temple v. Clinton Trust Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a renewal of litigation which was the subject of my opinion in Temple v. Clinton Trust Co., 141 N.J. Eq. 372, filed last February. In that case, the 35 complainants alleged that they had been depositors of the Trust Company on March 3d 1933, and that they had never been paid in full. They sued for moneys that were about to be distributed among the common stockholders of the company. I struck their bill of complaint on the ground that it appeared that they had received full satisfaction for whatever was due them as depositors and hence that they showed no interest in the fund.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- In Re LeuppNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Shearman v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Goodbody v. DelaneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.