Legal Opinion

French v. Folsom

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Contract for S500 paid by the plaintiff under an agreement in writing by which the defendant agreed to convey certain land to the plaintiff “by a good and sufficient deed.” Writ dated May 21, 1897. In the Superior Court Sherman, J. ordered a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action for breach of contract to recover a deposit paid by the plaintiff to the defendant in part performance of a written agreement entered into between the parties for the purchase and conveyance of certain premises described therein. The defendant agreed “ to execute and deliver a good and sufficient deed conveying said property on or before the 15th day of April, A. D. 1897.” The time was after-wards extended by mutual agreement to May 15. The premises were described by metes and bounds and then followed these words, “ Being the same premises conveyed to me [the defendant] by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daniell v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Linton v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Whittemore v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cashman v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Flier v. RubinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API