Ullman v. Harper
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 35 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED General Statutes, pp. 591, 593, 595. Revised Statutes, 2 Stanton, p. 314. Myers’s Supplement, p. 426. 3 Bush, 484, Paul v. Paul and wife. 8 Bush, 569, Ewing v. Riddle. CITED General Statutes, chap. 63, arts. 3, 6. Act of 1858, 2 Session Acts, 314. 8 Bush, 569, Ewing v. Biddle. 3 Bush, 484, Paul v. Paul and wife.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion of the court.
The conveyance made and executed by Joseph B. Harper invested Mrs. Susannah Harper with an estate for life in the house and lot, and her three children therein named with the fee in remainder. She evidently instituted this proceeding under the provisions of article 6, chapter 63 of the General Statutes. Section 1 of said article provides that “remainder and contingent interests in real estate may be sold upon petition of any person having a present or vested interest, all persons in being having any interest in such estate being made parties to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ewing v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871