Legal Opinion

Perry v. Potashinski

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition, to enforce a mechanic’s lien, under Pub. Sts. c. 191, for labor furnished under a subcontract in the erection of a building on the respondent’s land in Worcester. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Dewey, J., who found for the petitioner; and, at the respondent’s request, reported the case for the determination of this court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a petition to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor, under Pub. Sts. c. 191, and comes here on report. We will take up in their order the points that were argued.

1. The respondent had employed a contractor to build a house upon his land, under a contract which provided that the contractor should “ not let, assign, or transfer this contract, or any interest therein, without the written consent of the architect.” The petitioner made a written subcontract with the contractor .to excavate for the cellar, do the grading about the building, and build the foundation walls, referring to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Landers v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Borden v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Wahlstrom v. TrulsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Reid v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Vickery v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Monaghan v. GoddardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API