Legal Opinion

Chin Kee v. Kaeleku Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1927No. 1757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

On the 8tli day of April, 1925j the plaintiff brought suit against the defendant on a complaint alleging a trespass quare clausum fregit. The trespass was alleged to have been committed on or about the 10th day of De cember, 1923. The allegations of the complaint stated a case of simple trespass merely, entitling the plaintiff, if he recovered at all, to only actual or compensatory damages. The actual or compensatory damages were laid in the sum of $500. It was also alleged in the complaint, however, that the plaintiff had been damaged in the sum of $35001 Upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Chin Kee v. Kaeleku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City and County of Honolulu v. HsiungHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Dw Aina Le'a Development, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use CommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. City and County of Honolulu v. ShermanHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API