Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Company v. Cavallo

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1958No. 6293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Appellee E. M. Cavallo filed suit against Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, and Tony D. Ciochetti and Thomas E. Irwin, the engineer and fireman respectively of the company’s train, for personal injuries resulting from a collision between the train and plaintiff’s automobile at a highway-railroad crossing. Plaintiff received verdict and judgment in the sum of $40,000 and the defendants appeal. The first assignment of error is that the court should have granted defendants’ motion for judgment n.o.v. To test the correctness of the court’s refusal to render judgment for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Davis v. BoggsArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Young v. LiddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. Glen Downing and Independent Truckers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  5. Welch v. MedlockArizona Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rimondi v. BriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bogard G.M.C. Co. v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sheehy v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. McBride v. JR Simplot CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API