Legal Opinion

Edward E. Satchfield v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1970No. 30241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Edward E. Satchfield appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We reverse and remand with directions. 1

The appellant waived counsel and pled guilty to a Dyer Act offense, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He was sentenced on January 15, 1965 to serve an indeterminate sentence under the Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b).

The gravamen of appellant’s complaint presented in his § 2255 motion is that his guilty plea was not voluntarily or understandingly entered, since he was not apprised of the consequences of his plea.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jesse Coy Kimbrough v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. David S. Kotz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Marvel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Frank P. KentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. Richard Gonzalez James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. United States v. Alan Neal ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. CruzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API