Legal Opinion

In re Marlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, P. J.

The charges against this respondent are that, during the past eight years, he on many occasions gave valuable consideration to one Selinger and one Danziger, who were not *253attorneys and counselors at law, as an inducement for procuring negligence cases to be placed in the hands of the respondent in violation of the laws of the State of New York and of canons 27 and 28 of the Canons of Ethics of the American Bar Association, adopted by the New York State Bar Association on or about January 28, 1909; that the practice of law as conducted by the respondent amounted to the conduct of a business…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. People v. HankinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. In re ShuferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. In re WarbasseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API