Legal Opinion

Duggan v. Tomlinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 1964No. F-284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The sole question presented by this interlocutory appeal is whether Duval County, where plaintiff resides, is the proper venue of this suit in general assumpsit on an implied contract for the reasonable value of plaintiff’s services rendered defendant at the latter’s request and from which he benefited, even though defendant resides in Oka-loosa County.

The controlling statute on venue provides that suit shall be begun only in the county where the defendant resides, or where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located.1 If venue in this case is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croker v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. MA Kite Company v. AC Samford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Producers Supply, Inc. v. HarzSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Edgewater Drugs, Inc. v. Jax Drugs, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Davis v. DempseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Rupp v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Duggan v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  5. Ryder Leasing, Inc. v. JorgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API