John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wanda A. Welsh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRives, Chief Judge
With commendable candor the appellant’s counsel has I think, confessed by letter that the Court erred in favor of his client in the respect to which the petition for rehearing is granted, and of course, to that extent, I concur. Tentatively, however, I think that the rehearing should be further granted in to-to, and that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.
At the present juncture, I would have the Court request counsel to submit additional briefs on substantially the following questions:
1. Just what papers constitute the contract of insurance sued on? Does not the contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. VerneuilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Page v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. HanbackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.