Haley v. Medical Disciplinary Board
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUtter, J.
(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur in the court's decision to affirm the Board's decision to impose disciplinary sanctions on Dr. Haley. I dissent from the court's decision to overturn the Board's conclusion of law that Ms. G. was a patient of Dr. Haley at the time of *745their sexual contact. Finding of fact 2.5(e), which is not appealed from, is determinative of the legal issues in this case. That finding of fact reads(e) [M.] was a vulnerable sixteen year old during the time most of the relationship occurred. The relationship constituted the exploitation of a juvenile for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacEy v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- St. Francis Extended Health Care v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Public Hospital District No. 1 v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985