Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Haley v. Medical Disciplinary Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1991No. 57521-5Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUtter, J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur in the court's decision to affirm the Board's decision to impose disciplinary sanctions on Dr. Haley. I dissent from the court's decision to overturn the Board's conclusion of law that Ms. G. was a patient of Dr. Haley at the time of *745their sexual contact. Finding of fact 2.5(e), which is not appealed from, is determinative of the legal issues in this case. That finding of fact reads(e) [M.] was a vulnerable sixteen year old during the time most of the relationship occurred. The relationship constituted the exploitation of a juvenile for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacEy v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. St. Francis Extended Health Care v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Public Hospital District No. 1 v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API