Suleiman v. Cantino
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
Charles Cantino appeals an order distributing proceeds from the sale of certain exotic birds. The order grants priority to Cantino's judgment creditor, Jusuf Suleiman, over attorney's liens filed by Cantino's retained counsel, Franklin & Watkins (Franklin) for legal services performed in obtaining the release of the birds. The birds had been seized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 42. We affirm.
In March 1978, Suleiman and Cantino entered into a venture for the acquisition, importation, and sale of exotic Indonesian birds.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hsu Ying Li v. TangWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. KottsickWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Ross v. ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Department of Labor & Industries v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Seattle Trust & Savings Bank v. McCarthyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. HenkleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Ferguson Firm, PLLC v. Teller & Associates, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Smith v. MORAN, WINDES & WONG, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Smith v. Moran, Windes & Wong, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Wise v. City of ChelanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.