McKusick v. City of Stillwater
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Washington county, to restrain the defendant from entering upon her land in the city of Stillwater, to carry out the street improvement described in the opinion. The defendant appeals from the judgment entered on the report of Homer G. Eller, Esq., referee, before whom the action was tried.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of the lots 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13, in block 6, in Thompson, Parker & Mower’s second addition to Stillwater, having a frontage east on Martha street of 243 feet. On the 19th day of June in the year 1888, the common council of the city adopted a resolution fixing the grade of Martha street, and also a separate resolution directing that the same street be laid out, graded, widened, condemned, and opened as follows, viz., from the north line of Myrtle street to the south line of Mulberry street; and the city engineer of said city was directed to make and present to said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. ForrestalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Minneapolis v. WilkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Cook v. SlocumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Hunt v. City of MontevideoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Godfrey v. ValentineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Beers v. Incorporated Town of Gilmore CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Less Land Co. v. FenderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.