Legal Opinion

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 2026No. 2:16-cv-06516Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 16-6516 : COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. : MEMORANDUM Judge Juan R. Sánchez September 14, 2026 In its “bench brief,” provided to the Court at the August 4, 2026 pretrial conference, Promptu seeks a ruling, in advance of the inequitable conduct bench trial, that issue preclusion principles prevent Comcast from making any argument that

U.S. Patent No. 6,513,063

(“Julia”) is but-for material to the ʼ538 patent at issue in this case. Specifically, Promptu argues Comcast…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Jerre M. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API