Legal Opinion

United States v. Dennis Dayton Holt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2001No. 99-7150Published

1Opinion of the Court

264 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2001)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DENNIS DAYTON HOLT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-7150

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

September 5, 2001

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, (D.C. No. 99-CR-77-B)[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Richard A. Friedman, Appellate Section, Criminal Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., (Bruce Green, United States Attorney, and D. Michael Littlefield, Assistant United States Attorney, with him on the brief) for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael A. Abel, Assistant Federal…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lucero; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Murphy.

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API