Juliet M. D. Anton v. Greyhound Van Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KUNZIG, Judge.
This is a suit by Col. Juliet Anton (plaintiff or shipper) against Greyhound Van Lines, Inc. (defendant or carrier) to recover the full value of her household goods destroyed by fire while in transit in the carrier’s van between Montgomery, Alabama and Manchester, New Hampshire. The principal question for decision is whether the carrier effectively limited its liability for loss and damage of the goods in question within the meaning of 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(H) 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act. Because we affirm the district court’s finding that the carrier did not properly limit its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Glickfeld v. Howard Van Lines, Inc. Howard Van Lines, Inc. v. GlickfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Caten v. Salt City Movers & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Chandler v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Eastern Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Mechanical Technology Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Rohner Gehrig Company, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor TransitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.