Legal Opinion
Kalmich v. Bruno
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 14, 1975No. 74 C 3187PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FLAUM, District Judge:
This is an action for damages arising from the allegedly tortious seizure of the plaintiff’s textile business in Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1942. The plaintiff invokes this court’s diversity jurisdiction pleading that he is a citizen of Quebec, Canada and the defendant, Karl Bruno, is a citizen of the state of Illinois. [28 U.S.C. § 1332.] This cause of action is based on a Yugoslavian statute entitled “Law Concerning the Treatment of Property . . . Taken Away From the Owner by the Enemy or its Helpers” which created a civil cause of action for…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Pioneer National Title Insurance v. SaboDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- London Film Productions Ltd. v. Intercontinental Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Gennadiy Volodarskiy v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Manatee Cablevision Corp. v. PiersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.