Legal Opinion · Dissent

QBE Insurance v. Jinx-Proof Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2013Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J.P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I do not believe that either plaintiff-insurer’s January 31, 2008 or February 26, 2008 letters, both of which plaintiff styled as a reservation of rights, may serve as an effective written notice of disclaimer of coverage of the assault and battery based claims against defendant Jinx-Proof in the underlying litigation. Therefore, I dissent and would modify the order on appeal to deny plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and to declare that plaintiff is obligated to defend Jinx-Proof in the underlying action.

Defendant Vera Hendrix commenced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. First Financial Insurance v. Jetco Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. American Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Markevics v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API