Andrews v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
Ronald Bernard Andrews appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Andrews contends that (i) plea counsel provided ineffective assistance, and (ii) the trial court erred in finding that the duplicitous counts in his indictment did not merge for sentencing purposes.1 For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
After sentencing, “a guilty plea may only be withdrawn if the defendant establishes that such withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice — ineffective assistance of counsel or an involuntary or unknowingly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McKiernan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Lawton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Regent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Mark Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Randall Hogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Ronald Bernard Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014