Legal Opinion

Silvernagle & Co. v. Fluker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1869No. 2120PublishedCited by 2 opinions

from Fifth District Court, Parish of East Feliciana. Bosey, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.

This suit is based upon the foliowing note, to wit:

“ $1636 50. “ Basteop, La., August 9, 1861.
“ Oil the first day of January next, 1862, I promise to pay Silvernagle & Co. or bearer, sixteen hundred and thirty-six and fifty one-hundredths dollars, for value received, with eight per cent, interest from the first day of January last until paid.

(Signed) “ J. ANN ELUKER.

“per B. K. Fluker.”

The petition recites that Benjamin Silvernagle and Edward Starsney, who appear as plaintiffs, are the surviving members of the late commercial firm of Silvernagle & Co., composed of themselves and Wolf…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Borough of Carlisle v. Carlisle Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sentell v. WoodsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Fusilier v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API