Greene v. Maharaja of India, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge
I concur with all aspects of the majority’s opinion except that portion affirming the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC) order which, in calculating a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to the statutory fee formula, excluded attendant care benefits from the amount of benefits secured on behalf of the claimant. In entering his order awarding an attorney’s fee of $75,-000, the JCC took into consideration only $320,000 of benefits obtained by claimant’s attorney, excluding therefrom more than $3 million of the present and reasonably predictable future value of attendant care benefits. The JCC…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walt Disney World Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Polote Corp. v. MeredithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Barr v. Pantry PrideDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Fiesta Fashions, Inc. v. CapinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Samurai of the Falls, Inc. v. SulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.