Legal Opinion

State v. Garland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ON the trial of this rule for contempt of court,

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

The District Attorney of the Third Judicial District took a rule against the defendant to show cause why he should not be punished for a contempt of court charged to have been committed by him on the thirteenth of June, 1873, in the following manner : That immediately after vacating the bench for a recess (the court not having adjourned) the defendant approached John T. Ludeling, the Chief Justice, using towards him abusive and vituperative language, and at the same time made a violent assault upon his person. To the rule the defendant filed the following answer :

*533To the Honorable Judges of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. In re CaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  3. State Ex Rel. May v. KrichbaumTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lanoix v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API