State v. Garland
Supreme Court of Louisiana
ON the trial of this rule for contempt of court,
1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.
The District Attorney of the Third Judicial District took a rule against the defendant to show cause why he should not be punished for a contempt of court charged to have been committed by him on the thirteenth of June, 1873, in the following manner : That immediately after vacating the bench for a recess (the court not having adjourned) the defendant approached John T. Ludeling, the Chief Justice, using towards him abusive and vituperative language, and at the same time made a violent assault upon his person. To the rule the defendant filed the following answer :
*533To the Honorable Judges of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte McCownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- In re CaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- State Ex Rel. May v. KrichbaumTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Lanoix v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943