Legal Opinion

Brenda Ramos v. Christopher Taylor and The City of Austin

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 29, 2026No. 1:20-cv-01256Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION BRENDA RAMOS, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:20-CV-1256-RP § CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR and § THE CITY OF AUSTIN, § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Brenda Ramos’s (“Plaintiff’”) Motion to Certify Taylor’s Interlocutory Appeal as Frivolous. (Mot. to Certify as Frivolous, Dkt. 148). Defendant Christopher Taylor (“Taylor”) filed a response, (Dkt. 151), and Plaintiff filed a reply (Dkt. 152). Having reviewed the motion, responses, and applicable law, the Court will deny the motion to certify Taylor’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zarnow v. CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEX.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. BancPass, Inc. v. Highway Toll Administration, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. W. Douglas Williams v. The Honorable Jack BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Carty v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API